Introduction
Aligned is a decentralized network designed to verify Zero-Knowledge (ZK) and validity proofs, with results posted directly to Ethereum. Utilizing EigenLayer’s restaking mechanism, Aligned achieves high-throughput, low-latency, and cost-effective proof verification without competing for Ethereum’s blockspace. Depending on application needs, this dual-mode operation optimizes for either speed or security.
Innovation
Aligned introduces a groundbreaking solution to the challenges of ZK proof verification by:
- Leveraging Restaking: Inherits Ethereum’s security via EigenLayer, reducing the need for separate consensus mechanisms.
- Dual-Mode Operation: Offers flexibility with “Fast Mode” for speed and cost-efficiency and “Aggregation Mode” for enhanced security and scalability.
- Proof-System Agnostic Infrastructure: This infrastructure supports multiple proof systems (e.g., Groth16, PLONK, STARKs), broadening its applicability across use cases.
Architecture
Aligned’s architecture integrates key components for efficient operation:
- Operators: Restaked Ethereum validators who verify proofs off-chain by executing verification code natively. This approach prioritizes speed and minimizes costs.
- Batcher: Organizes proofs into batches for verification, offering an optional intermediary service to reduce user friction.
- BLS Signature Aggregator: Ensures on-chain verification by collecting operator signatures and achieving a two-thirds majority quorum.
Operational Modes
- Fast Mode:
- Mechanism: Operators verify proofs off-chain and sign them, with aggregated signatures validated on-chain.
- Advantages:
- High throughput (>1,000 proofs/second).
- Low latency, suitable for time-sensitive applications.
- Cost-efficient, reducing verification expenses by up to 99%.
- Security Considerations: Relies on at least 67% honest operators to maintain integrity and prevent false proofs.
- Aggregation Mode:
- Mechanism: Aggregates multiple proofs into a single recursive proof for on-chain validation.
- Advantages: Full Ethereum security guarantees.
- Trade-offs: Higher latency and operational costs compared to Fast Mode.
Code Quality
Aligned’s codebase demonstrates:
- Modular Design: Ensures flexibility for supporting various proof systems and scaling infrastructure.
- Optimization for Performance: Native execution of verification code enhances speed and reduces operational overhead.
- Comprehensive Testing: Focuses on ensuring security, robustness, and fault tolerance in critical components like operator consensus and signature aggregation.
- Open Source Commitment: Aligned fosters transparency and community-driven development by maintaining an accessible codebase.
Product Roadmap
- Near-Term Goals:
- Expand support for additional proof systems to accommodate diverse application needs.
- Enhance operator incentives to encourage decentralization and reliability.
- Long-Term Vision:
- Integrate with emerging rollup frameworks and cross-chain protocols.
- Develop partnerships with projects leveraging ZK technologies in DeFi, machine learning, and identity verification.
Usability
Aligned’s usability features include:
- Developer-Centric Design: Offers SDKs and APIs for seamless integration with existing applications.
- Proof-System Agnosticism: Simplifies adoption by providing support for multiple ZK-proof systems.
- Low Barrier to Entry: Enables projects to utilize Fast Mode for immediate benefits without extensive development overhead.
Team
Aligned’s team comprises experts in blockchain, cryptography, and distributed systems. Their experience spans:
- Building scalable blockchain infrastructure.
- Advancing ZK-proof technologies.
- Integrating secure staking mechanisms like EigenLayer. The team’s collective expertise ensures robust development and alignment with industry standards.
Conclusion
Aligned’s innovative ZK proof verification approach addresses Ethereum’s critical scalability, cost, and latency bottlenecks. By leveraging EigenLayer’s restaking and supporting a variety of proof systems, Aligned sets a new standard for verifiable computation. Its dual-mode operation, coupled with strong economic incentives and modular design, positions it as a key enabler for rollups, bridges, and beyond applications. At the same time, challenges like EigenLayer dependency and operator decentralization remain; Aligned’s roadmap and architectural flexibility offer promising solutions for the blockchain ecosystem.
Initial Screening | |||
Keep researching | |||
Does this project need to use blockchain technology? | Yes | ||
Can this project be realized? | Yes | ||
Is there a viable use case for this project? | Yes | ||
Is the project protected from commonly known attacks? | Yes | ||
Are there no careless errors in the whitepaper? | Yes | ||
Project Technology Score | |||
Description | Scorecard | ||
Innovation (Out Of 11) | 8 | ||
How have similar projects performed? | Medium | 1 | |
Are there too many innovations? | Regular | 2 | |
Percentage of crypto users that will use the project? | 6%-10% | 3 | |
Is the project unique? | Yes | 2 | |
Architecture (Out of 12) | 11 | ||
Overall feeling after reading whitepaper? | Good | 2 | |
Resistance to possible attacks? | Good | 2 | |
Complexity of the architecture? | Not too Complex | 2 | |
Time taken to understand the architecture? | 20-50 min | 1 | |
Overall feeling about the architecture after deeper research? | Good | 4 | |
Has the project been hacked? | No | 0 | |
Code Quality (out of 15) | 14 | ||
Is the project open source? | Yes | 2 | |
Does the project use good code like C,C++, Rust, Erlang, Ruby, etc? | Yes | 2 | |
Could the project use better programming languages? | No | 0 | |
Github number of lines? | More than 10K | 1 | |
Github commits per month? | More than 10 | 2 | |
What is the quality of the code? | Good | 2 | |
How well is the code commented? | Good | 1 | |
Overall quality of the test coverage? | Outstanding | 2 | |
Overall quality of the maintainability index? | Outstanding | 2 | |
When Mainnet (out of 5) | 5 | ||
When does the mainnet come out? | Mainnet | 5 | |
Usability for Infrastructure Projects (out of 5) | 3 | ||
Is it easy to use for the end customer? | Medium | 3 | |
Team (out of 7) | 5 | ||
Number of active developers? | 5+ | 2 | |
Developers average Git Background? | Intermediate | 1 | |
Developers coding style? | solid | 3 | |
Total Score (out of 55) | 47 | ||
Percentage Score | |||
Innovation | 14.55% | ||
Architecture | 20.00% | ||
Code Quality | 25.45% | ||
Mainnet | 9.09% | ||
Usability | 5.45% | ||
Team | 9.09% | ||
Total | 83.64% |