Introduction
Andromeda Protocol emerges as a comprehensive framework designed to expedite development processes in Web 3.0 and blockchain industries. With its focus on enhancing user experience through simplicity and efficiency, it introduces the concept of Andromeda Digital Objects (ADOs) – a revolutionary approach to smart contract interoperability and updates.
Innovation
The core innovation of Andromeda lies in its ADOs, facilitating the creation of adaptable and updateable smart contracts. This innovation extends to its user-friendly No-Code-Builder, enabling users to construct projects effortlessly. The Andromeda CLI and GraphQL servers further augment this innovation by offering seamless interaction across diverse blockchain networks.
Architecture
Andromeda‘s architecture impresses with its well-structured design centered around ADOs. These smart contracts are purpose-built for scalability and interoperability, offering a modular approach to blockchain development. The protocol’s chain-agnostic design is primed for deployment across all Cosmos chains, representing a significant architectural achievement.
Code Quality
The Andromeda Protocol exhibits exceptional code quality. The clarity and precision of the code, coupled with high-quality comments, demonstrate a meticulous approach to development. The project excels in all code quality metrics, signifying a robust and reliable framework.
Product Roadmap
While Andromeda has made strides in deploying on testnets of major Cosmos-based chains like Injective, Terra, Stargaze, and Juno, information regarding its mainnet launch still needs to be discovered. The roadmap shows a promising trajectory, yet more clarity on future milestones would be beneficial.
Usability
The usability of Andromeda stands out, particularly for infrastructure projects. Its templates provide comprehensive support for integration with other protocols and Cosmos-based chains using IBC, making it a versatile and user-friendly option for developers.
Andromeda Team
The Andromeda Protocol is backed by a team of over five active contributors, each possessing a solid background in Git and coding. This team composition reflects a blend of experience and expertise, promising continued excellence in the project’s development.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the Andromeda Protocol positions itself as a forward-thinking, innovative framework in the blockchain space. Its commitment to ease of use and high-quality code and architecture sets a new standard for blockchain development tools. While some aspects, like its mainnet launch details, are yet to be clarified, the project’s overall direction and execution are commendable.
| Initial Screening | |||
| Keep researching | |||
| Does this project need to use blockchain technology? | Yes | ||
| Can this project be realized? | Yes | ||
| Is there a viable use case for this project? | Yes | ||
| Is the project protected from commonly known attacks? | Yes | ||
| Are there no careless errors in the whitepaper? | Yes | ||
| Project Technology Score | |||
| Description | Scorecard | ||
| Innovation (Out Of 11) | 10 | ||
| How have similar projects performed? | Good | 1 | |
| Are there too many innovations? | Medium | 2 | |
| Percentage of crypto users that will use the project? | 6% – 10% | 3 | |
| Is the project unique? | Yes | 2 | |
| Architecture (Out of 12) | 11 | ||
| Overall feeling after reading whitepaper? | Good | 2 | |
| Resistance to possible attacks? | Good | 2 | |
| Complexity of the architecture? | Not too complex | 2 | |
| Time taken to understand the architecture? | 20 – 50 min | 1 | |
| Overall feeling about the architecture after deeper research? | Good | 4 | |
| Has the project been hacked ? | No | 0 | |
| Code Quality (out of 15) | 15 | ||
| Is the project open source? | Yes | 2 | |
| Does the project use good code like C,C++, Rust, Erlang, Ruby, etc? | Yes | 2 | |
| Could the project use better programming languages? | No | 0 | |
| Github number of lines? | More than 10K | 1 | |
| Github commits per month? | More than 10 | 2 | |
| What is the quality of the code? | Good | 2 | |
| How well is the code commented? | Outstanding | 2 | |
| Overall quality of the test coverage? | Outstanding | 2 | |
| Overall quality of the maintainability index? | Outstanding | 2 | |
| When Mainnet (out of 5) | 5 | ||
| When does the mainnet come out? | Mainnet Ready | 5 | |
| Usability for Infrastructure Projects (out of 5) | 5 | ||
| Is it easy to use for the end customer? | Yes | 5 | |
| Team (out of 7) | 6 | ||
| Number of active developers? | 5+ | 2 | |
| Developers average Git Background? | Senior | 2 | |
| Developers coding style? | Solid | 2 | |
| Total Score (out of 55) | 50 | ||
| Percentage Score | |||
| Innovation | 14.55% | ||
| Architecture | 20.00% | ||
| Code Quality | 27.27% | ||
| Mainnet | 9.09% | ||
| Usability | 9.09% | ||
| Team | 10.91% | ||
| Total | 90.91% |
