Introduction
Fluent is a next-generation blockchain platform that integrates the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), Solana Virtual Machine (SVM), and WebAssembly (Wasm) into a unified execution environment. This innovative architecture enables seamless cross-VM composability and efficient execution through rWasm, a specialized intermediate representation optimized for zero-knowledge (zk) operations. This review objectively analyzes Fluent’s innovation, architecture, code quality, roadmap, usability, team, and overall viability.
Innovation
Fluent introduces the concept of blended execution, allowing applications designed for different VMs to interact natively within a single blockchain without friction. This approach abstracts the underlying execution environments, creating a maximally expressive on-chain framework. The key innovation lies in:
- rWasm (Reduced WebAssembly): A low-level intermediate representation that compiles EVM, SVM, and Wasm contracts into a unified format for execution.
- Zero-Knowledge Rollups (zk-rollups): Fluent integrates zk-proofs to enhance Ethereum security while reducing the cost and latency of transactions.
- Parallel Execution: Unlike traditional single-threaded execution models, Fluent enables concurrent execution of contracts across different VMs.
- Shared Liquidity & Network Effects: Existing apps benefit from seamless composability, eliminating ecosystem silos.
Architecture
Fluent’s architecture is designed for interoperability and efficiency. It consists of:
- Fluent VM: The core execution layer where EVM, SVM, and Wasm smart contracts are compiled into rWasm for seamless interoperability.
- Compatibility Contracts: Middleware Wasm-based contracts that act as system libraries, providing cross-VM access through a unified API.
- Fluent L2: A zk-rollup-based Layer 2 network that enables blended execution of different VM targets within a shared state environment.
- Fluentbase Framework: An SDK and proving system facilitating the deployment of modular blockchains and verifiable compute environments.
- Journaled ZK Trie (JZKT): A storage mechanism that enhances zk proving efficiency by maintaining a structured state representation.
Code Quality
The codebase for Fluent is still under development, but initial indicators suggest a structured approach to modularity and zk-optimization. The use of rWasm allows Fluent to maintain a single state transition proof, reducing computational overhead and ensuring zk-friendly execution. The development environment supports:
- Solidity, Rust, and other blockchain-native languages.
- Precompiled contracts for efficient VM abstraction.
- Systematic handling of ABI encodings to maintain backward compatibility.
- Optimized zk-proof generation for cross-VM interactions.
Product Roadmap
Fluent’s roadmap includes several key milestones:
- Fluent Public Devnet (Ongoing): Supports deploying EVM and Rust-based smart contracts but lacks rollup and zk functionalities at this stage.
- Execution Layer Refinement: Enhancements to further modularize the execution layer.
- Decentralized Sequencer Development: Integrated into the Fluent stack to optimize transaction ordering.
- Incubation Programs & Developer Relations: Supporting early-stage projects leveraging Fluent’s blended execution framework.
- Mainnet Launch: Future plans include a production-ready version with full zk-rollup integration and compatibility with modular DA layers like Celestia and Avail.
Usability
Fluent is designed with developer experience in mind. The platform provides:
- A single-wallet experience for interacting with contracts from different VMs.
- Fluentbase SDK for simplified contract deployment.
- Support for existing Ethereum and Solana tooling, minimizing onboarding friction.
- Cross-language development capabilities, allowing developers to optimize performance per component.
Team
Fluent is backed by an experienced team working on innovative execution models and zk-enabled blockchain scaling. The team’s focus includes:
- Building developer experience applications to showcase Fluent’s capabilities.
- Supporting incubation efforts for projects utilizing blended execution.
- Engaging over 60 teams currently developing on the platform.
- Maintaining a $375K monthly burn rate with an 8-month runway and funding targets of $20M at a $200M valuation or $8M at an $80M valuation.
Conclusion
Fluent represents a novel approach to blockchain execution, bridging multiple VM environments into a cohesive state. Its rWasm-based abstraction, zk-rollup security model, and real-time cross-VM composability make it a strong contender in the multi-VM blockchain space. While still in development, Fluent has the potential to reshape how smart contracts interact across ecosystems, fostering greater interoperability and efficiency.
Initial Screening | |||
Keep researching | |||
Does this project need to use blockchain technology? | Yes | ||
Can this project be realized? | Yes | ||
Is there a viable use case for this project? | Yes | ||
Is the project protected from commonly known attacks? | Yes | ||
Are there no careless errors in the whitepaper? | Yes | ||
Project Technology Score | |||
Description | Scorecard | ||
Innovation (Out Of 11) | 11 | ||
How have similar projects performed? | Good | 2 | |
Are there too many innovations? | Regular | 2 | |
Percentage of crypto users that will use the project? | Over 11% | 5 | |
Is the project unique? | Yes | 2 | |
Architecture (Out of 12) | 11 | ||
Overall feeling after reading whitepaper? | Good | 2 | |
Resistance to possible attacks? | Good | 2 | |
Complexity of the architecture? | Not too complex | 0 | |
Time taken to understand the architecture? | More than 1 hour | 0 | |
Overall feeling about the architecture after deeper research? | Good | 4 | |
Has the project been hacked? | No | 0 | |
Code Quality (out of 15) | 13 | ||
Is the project open source? | Yes | 2 | |
Does the project use good code like C,C++, Rust, Erlang, Ruby, etc? | Yes | 2 | |
Could the project use better programming languages? | No | 0 | |
Github number of lines? | More than 10K | 1 | |
Github commits per month? | More than 10 | 2 | |
What is the quality of the code? | Good | 2 | |
How well is the code commented? | Good | 1 | |
Overall quality of the test coverage? | Outstanding | 2 | |
Overall quality of the maintainability index? | Good | 1 | |
When Mainnet (out of 5) | 5 | ||
When does the mainnet come out? | Mainnet Ready | 5 | |
Usability for Infrastructure Projects (out of 5) | 5 | ||
Is it easy to use for the end customer? | Yes | 5 | |
Team (out of 7) | 6 | ||
Number of active developers? | 5+ | 2 | |
Developers average Git Background? | Intermediate | 1 | |
Developers coding style? | Outstanding | 3 | |
Total Score (out of 55) | 50 | ||
Percentage Score | |||
Innovation | 20.00% | ||
Architecture | 18.18% | ||
Code Quality | 23.64% | ||
Mainnet | 9.09% | ||
Usability | 9.09% | ||
Team | 10.91% | ||
Total | 90.01% |