Introduction
Joystream represents a profound innovation in the video streaming landscape. This review seeks to comprehensively assess Joystream’s technological stack, architecture, codebase quality, development roadmap, usability, and the team behind it.
Innovation
Joystream’s blockchain and Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) serve as a foundation that promises a revolution in video streaming. Their system inherently promotes decentralization, allowing multiple applications to share and distribute content. Such an approach fosters a cohesive and synergistic ecosystem.
Architecture
Based on the Substrate blockchain development framework, Joystream’s standalone L1 blockchain ensures security and decentralization. Their content, social, governance, and asset ledger lie at the heart of their network, choreographing various activities across various users, creators, and applications.
Code Quality
Joystream’s open-source codebase is impressive. Utilizing modern languages like Rust underscores their commitment to safety and performance. Their consistent activity on GitHub and meticulous documentation further exemplifies their dedication to quality and transparency.
Product Roadmap
Joystream is not just a whitepaper project; its mainnet is live, underscoring its tangible contributions to the blockchain landscape.
Usability
Joystream’s intuitive design ensures a seamless experience for the end user. The blend of NFT features, creator rewards, and a robust content directory provides both content creators and viewers derive maximum value.
Joystream Team
A glance at the development activity and the team’s background shows a group of dedicated and skilled individuals. Their experience, evident from their coding style and project contributions, speaks to their capability and commitment.
Conclusion
Joystream’s approach to decentralized video streaming, grounded in blockchain and DAO, promises to redefine the relationship between content creators and their audiences. With a total score of 47/55 (85.45%), Joystream’s commitment to innovation, user experience, and technological robustness makes it a standout project in the streaming sector.
| Initial Screening | |||
| Keep researching | |||
| Does this project need to use blockchain technology? | Yes | ||
| Can this project be realized? | Yes | ||
| Is there a viable use case for this project? | Yes | ||
| Is the project protected from commonly known attacks? | Yes | ||
| Are there no careless errors in the whitepaper? | Yes | ||
| Project Technology Score | |||
| Description | Scorecard | ||
| Innovation (Out Of 11) | 9 | ||
| How have similar projects performed? | Good | 2 | |
| Are there too many innovations? | Regular | 2 | |
| Percentage of crypto users that will use the project? | 6 – 10% | 3 | |
| Is the project unique? | Yes | 2 | |
| Architecture (Out of 12) | 11 | ||
| Overall feeling after reading whitepaper? | Good | 2 | |
| Resistance to possible attacks? | Good | 2 | |
| Complexity of the architecture? | Not too complex | 2 | |
| Time taken to understand the architecture? | 20-50 min | 1 | |
| Overall feeling about the architecture after deeper research? | Good | 4 | |
| Has the project been hacked ? | No | 0 | |
| Code Quality (out of 15) | 12 | ||
| Is the project open source? | Yes | 2 | |
| Does the project use good code like C,C++, Rust, Erlang, Ruby, etc? | Yes | 2 | |
| Could the project use better programming languages? | No | 0 | |
| Github number of lines? | More than 10K | 1 | |
| Github commits per month? | More than 10 | 2 | |
| What is the quality of the code? | Good | 2 | |
| How well is the code commented? | Good | 1 | |
| Overall quality of the test coverage? | Good | 1 | |
| Overall quality of the maintainability index? | Good | 1 | |
| When Mainnet (out of 5) | 5 | ||
| When does the mainnet come out? | Mainnet Ready | 5 | |
| Usability for Infrastructure Projects (out of 5) | 5 | ||
| Is it easy to use for the end customer? | Yes | 5 | |
| Team (out of 7) | 5 | ||
| Number of active developers? | 5+ | 2 | |
| Developers average Git Background? | Intermediate | 1 | |
| Developers coding style? | Solid | 2 | |
| Total Score (out of 55) | 47 | ||
| Percentage Score | |||
| Innovation | 16.36% | ||
| Architecture | 20.00% | ||
| Code Quality | 21.82% | ||
| Mainnet | 9.09% | ||
| Usability | 9.09% | ||
| Team | 9.09% | ||
| Total | 85.45% |
