Introduction
Polygon zkEVM represents a significant stride in Ethereum scalability, focusing on performance and security. By leveraging zkSNARK technology, this initiative aims to optimize user costs while maintaining compatibility with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), marking a notable advancement in blockchain technology.
Innovation
At the heart of Polygon zkEVM‘s innovation is the implementation of zkSNARKs within Layer 1, designed to enhance scalability and reduce user costs. This breakthrough allows the deployment onto EVM without necessitating alterations in the existing codebase, thereby ensuring compatibility and ease of integration.
Architecture
Polygon Hermez’s architectural choice, specifically adopting 64-bit small field STARK proof generation as advised by Polygon Zero, underpins its robustness. This approach, combined with recursive proofs derived from Plonky2, positions Polygon zkEVM at the forefront of efficient prover systems. The architecture’s emphasis on speed and efficiency without compromising security is a key highlight.
Code Quality
The codebase of Polygon zkEVM demonstrates exceptional quality, characterized by clarity, efficiency, and adherence to best practices in software development. This high standard of coding is essential for ensuring the reliability and security of the system.
Product Roadmap
While Polygon zkEVM is in its beta phase, its roadmap promises continued innovation and enhancements. Integrating new technologies and consistent updates indicates a commitment to staying at the cutting edge of blockchain scalability solutions.
Usability
The usability of Polygon zkEVM is greatly enhanced by Web3Modal, an intuitive SDK that facilitates easy integration with various wallet types. This user-centric approach ensures a seamless user experience, underlining the platform’s commitment to accessibility and convenience.
Polygon zkEVM Team
The development team behind Polygon zkEVM is vast and boasts significant experience in the field. This expertise is a driving force in the project‘s ongoing development and success, reflecting a deep understanding of the technical and practical aspects of blockchain scalability.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Polygon zkEVM stands out as a leading solution in Ethereum scalability, marrying innovation with practicality. Its robust architecture, exceptional code quality, and user-centric design, supported by a skilled and experienced team, position it as a pivotal player in advancing blockchain technology. As the project evolves, it is poised to significantly contribute to the ecosystem, promising enhanced performance and security for users and developers alike.
| Initial Screening | |||
| Keep researching | |||
| Does this project need to use blockchain technology? | Yes | ||
| Can this project be realized? | Yes | ||
| Is there a viable use case for this project? | Yes | ||
| Is the project protected from commonly known attacks? | Yes | ||
| Are there no careless errors in the whitepaper? | Yes | ||
| Project Technology Score | |||
| Description | Scorecard | ||
| Innovation (Out Of 11) | 11 | ||
| How have similar projects performed? | Good | 2 | |
| Are there too many innovations? | Regular | 2 | |
| Percentage of crypto users that will use the project? | Over 11% | 5 | |
| Is the project unique? | Yes | 2 | |
| Architecture (Out of 12) | 9 | ||
| Overall feeling after reading whitepaper? | Good | 2 | |
| Resistance to possible attacks? | Good | 2 | |
| Complexity of the architecture? | Not too complex | 2 | |
| Time taken to understand the architecture? | 20 – 50 min | 1 | |
| Overall feeling about the architecture after deeper research? | Medium | 2 | |
| Has the project been hacked ? | No | 0 | |
| Code Quality (out of 15) | 14 | ||
| Is the project open source? | Yes | 2 | |
| Does the project use good code like C,C++, Rust, Erlang, Ruby, etc? | Yes | 2 | |
| Could the project use better programming languages? | No | 0 | |
| Github number of lines? | More than 10K | 1 | |
| Github commits per month? | More than 10 | 2 | |
| What is the quality of the code? | Good | 2 | |
| How well is the code commented? | Good | 1 | |
| Overall quality of the test coverage? | Outstanding | 2 | |
| Overall quality of the maintainability index? | Outstanding | 2 | |
| When Mainnet (out of 5) | 5 | ||
| When does the mainnet come out? | Mainnet Ready | 5 | |
| Usability for Infrastructure Projects (out of 5) | 5 | ||
| Is it easy to use for the end customer? | Yes | 5 | |
| Team (out of 7) | 7 | ||
| Number of active developers? | 5+ | 2 | |
| Developers average Git Background? | Senior | 2 | |
| Developers coding style? | Outstanding | 3 | |
| Total Score (out of 55) | 51 | ||
| Percentage Score | |||
| Innovation | 20.00% | ||
| Architecture | 16.36% | ||
| Code Quality | 25.45% | ||
| Mainnet | 9.09% | ||
| Usability | 9.09% | ||
| Team | 12.73% | ||
| Total | 92.73% |
