Introduction
Rooch is a modular Layer 2 blockchain project that aims to enhance multi-chain settlement, scalability, and security for Web3 DApps using the Move programming language. It offers unique value propositions such as Ethereum layer 2 with multi-chain settlement, transaction and state scaling for layer 1, improved performance and security on layer 2, and more possibilities for layer 3 through Modular DApp and P2P DApp.
Innovation
Rooch’s innovation score is 18.18%, reflecting its impressive approach to multi-chain settlement, transaction and state scaling, and modular architecture. It leverages the Move programming language to provide a safe and high-throughput execution environment, while also enabling cross-layer interoperability.
Architecture
Rooch’s architecture score is 20.00%, indicating a well-designed and comprehensive system. It consists of the Execution Layer, Network Middleware, DA Layer, Arbitration Layer, and Settlement. The modular design allows for different combinations based on specific application scenarios. The project utilizes the Ethereum network as the arbitration layer to ensure the security of cross-chain bridges in multi-chain settlement.
Code Quality
Rooch’s code quality score is 21.82%, reflecting its strong development practices. The project is open source and employs good programming languages such as C, C++, Rust, Erlang, or Ruby. The codebase has a substantial number of lines and commits per month. However, there is room for improvement in code commenting to enhance readability and maintainability.
Product Roadmap
The mainnet launch of Rooch is scheduled for December 2023, and it plans to integrate features such as Multi-chain settlement, ZK-Proofs + Fraud Proofs, and state migration from Layer 1 in 2024. The roadmap demonstrates a clear vision for the project’s development and evolution.
Usability
Rooch achieves a usability score of 9.09% for infrastructure projects, indicating its ease of use for end customers. The project aims to provide a seamless experience for DApp developers and users by offering scalable solutions and a unified settlement protocol.
Team
The team behind Rooch consists of experienced professionals who have made notable contributions in the Move, blockchain development, and Layer 2 solutions space. The team’s expertise, coupled with their outstanding coding style, contributes to a team score of 10.91%.
Conclusion
Rooch is an innovative modular Layer 2 blockchain solution that aims to enhance multi-chain settlement, scalability, and security for Web3 DApps. Its unique value propositions, robust architecture, strong code quality, and a talented team position it as a promising project in the blockchain ecosystem. With a technical score of 80.00% and the potential for further improvements after the mainnet launch, Rooch demonstrates a solid foundation for its future development and adoption.
| Initial Screening | |||
| Keep researching | |||
| Does this project need to use blockchain technology? | Yes | ||
| Can this project be realized? | Yes | ||
| Is there a viable use case for this project? | Yes | ||
| Is the project protected from commonly known attacks? | Yes | ||
| Are there no careless errors in the whitepaper? | Yes | ||
| Project Technology Score | |||
| Description | Scorecard | ||
| Innovation (Out Of 11) | 10 | ||
| How have similar projects performed? | Good | 2 | |
| Are there too many innovations? | Medium | 1 | |
| Percentage of crypto users that will use the project? | Over 11% | 5 | |
| Is the project unique? | Yes | 2 | |
| Architecture (Out of 12) | 11 | ||
| Overall feeling after reading whitepaper? | Good | 2 | |
| Resistance to possible attacks? | Good | 2 | |
| Complexity of the architecture? | Not too Complex | 2 | |
| Time taken to understand the architecture? | 20-50min | 1 | |
| Overall feeling about the architecture after deeper research? | Good | 4 | |
| Has the project been hacked? | No | 0 | |
| Code Quality (out of 15) | 12 | ||
| Is the project open source? | Yes | 2 | |
| Does the project use good code like C,C++, Rust, Erlang, Ruby, etc? | Yes | 2 | |
| Could the project use better programming languages? | No | 0 | |
| Github number of lines? | More than 10K | 1 | |
| Github commits per month? | More than 10 | 2 | |
| What is the quality of the code? | Good | 2 | |
| How well is the code commented? | Bad | 0 | |
| Overall quality of the test coverage? | Good | 1 | |
| Overall quality of the maintainability index? | Outstanding | 2 | |
| When Mainnet (out of 5) | 5 | ||
| When does the mainnet come out? | Mainnet Ready | 5 | |
| Usability for Infrastructure Projects (out of 5) | 5 | ||
| Is it easy to use for the end customer? | Yes | 5 | |
| Team (out of 7) | 6 | ||
| Number of active developers? | 5+ | 1 | |
| Developers average Git Background? | Senior | 2 | |
| Developers coding style? | Outstanding | 3 | |
| Total Score (out of 55) | 49 | ||
| Percentage Score | |||
| Innovation | 18.18% | ||
| Architecture | 20.00% | ||
| Code Quality | 21.82% | ||
| Mainnet | 9.09% | ||
| Usability | 9.09% | ||
| Team | 10.91% | ||
| Total | 89.09% |
