Introduction
SubQuery Network is a revolutionary web3 platform tackling centralization challenges in middleware services such as indexers and RPC providers. It aims to uphold web3’s vision without sacrificing reliability, scalability, or performance by offering a decentralized infrastructure for efficient data access and indexing across multiple blockchains.
Innovation
SubQuery stands out with its unique ecosystem of Consumers, RPC Providers, Data Indexers, and Delegators, who all contribute to a network built on decentralization and performance. The economic model incentivizes active participation while ensuring network health through inflation rewards.
Architecture
Its architecture redistributes the data indexing and querying process across various network participants, reducing dependence on centralized components. This decentralization strengthens SubQuery‘s robustness and censorship resistance, aligning with the ethos of web3.
- Consumers: Pay for data requests using SQT, creating a demand-driven economy.
- RPC Providers & Data Indexers: Manage the infrastructure for processing data requests.
- Delegators: Stake SQT with operators to earn rewards proportionate to their work.
Code Quality
SubQuery’s code quality reflects its ability to maintain robust indexing operations across various blockchains. Regular audits and an open-source approach foster transparency and collaboration within the community, ensuring continuous improvements.
Product Roadmap
SubQuery‘s product roadmap demonstrates a solid commitment to multi-chain support, positioning itself as an essential tool for developers. Its approach prioritizes cross-chain interoperability and data sharing, critical components of a maturing web3 ecosystem.
SubQuery Usability
The platform’s innovative payment models cater to different user preferences:
- Flex Plans: Offer a PAYG model, where rewards are based on the Cobb-Douglas function.
- Closed Agreements: Foster direct relationships between operators and consumers.
- Agreement Offers: Enhance service quality by incentivizing competition.
Team
SubQuery’s team comprises web3 veterans and experts in decentralized infrastructure, ensuring strategic direction and technical execution align with industry needs.
Conclusion
SubQuery Network has the potential to redefine web3 middleware by enabling decentralized, efficient, and multi-chain data indexing. While adoption challenges, network security, and the balance between decentralization and efficiency must be addressed, its robust technical infrastructure and economic incentives provide a solid foundation. The platform’s success hinges on attracting a vibrant community of developers and participants, creating a self-sustaining ecosystem that exemplifies the ideals of web3.
Initial Screening | |||
Keep researching | |||
Does this project need to use blockchain technology? | Yes | ||
Can this project be realized? | Yes | ||
Is there a viable use case for this project? | Yes | ||
Is the project protected from commonly known attacks? | Yes | ||
Are there no careless errors in the whitepaper? | Yes | ||
Project Technology Score | |||
Description | Scorecard | ||
Innovation (Out Of 11) | 9 | ||
How have similar projects performed? | Good | 2 | |
Are there too many innovations? | Regular | 2 | |
Percentage of crypto users that will use the project? | 6 – 10% | 3 | |
Is the project unique? | Yes | 2 | |
Architecture (Out of 12) | 11 | ||
Overall feeling after reading whitepaper? | Good | 2 | |
Resistance to possible attacks? | Good | 2 | |
Complexity of the architecture? | Not Too Complex | 2 | |
Time taken to understand the architecture? | 20 – 50 min | 1 | |
Overall feeling about the architecture after deeper research? | Good | 4 | |
Has the project been hacked ? | No | 0 | |
Code Quality (out of 15) | 14 | ||
Is the project open source? | Yes | 2 | |
Does the project use good code like C,C++, Rust, Erlang, Ruby, etc? | Yes | 2 | |
Could the project use better programming languages? | No | 0 | |
Github number of lines? | More than 10K | 1 | |
Github commits per month? | More than 10 | 2 | |
What is the quality of the code? | Good | 2 | |
How well is the code commented? | Good | 1 | |
Overall quality of the test coverage? | Outstanding | 2 | |
Overall quality of the maintainability index? | Outstanding | 2 | |
When Mainnet (out of 5) | 5 | ||
When does the mainnet come out? | Mainnet Ready | 5 | |
Usability for Infrastructure Projects (out of 5) | 5 | ||
Is it easy to use for the end customer? | Yes | 5 | |
Team (out of 7) | 6 | ||
Number of active developers? | 5+ | 2 | |
Developers average Git Background? | Senior | 2 | |
Developers coding style? | Solid | 2 | |
Total Score (out of 55) | 48 | ||
Percentage Score | |||
Innovation | 16.36% | ||
Architecture | 20.00% | ||
Code Quality | 25.45% | ||
Mainnet | 9.09% | ||
Usability | 5.45% | ||
Team | 10.91% | ||
Total | 87.27% |