Introduction
Xai is designed to enable open trade in the next generation of video games, allowing traditional gamers to own and trade in-game items without needing to interact with crypto-wallets. As the world’s first Layer 3 solution for AAA gaming, Xai utilizes Offchain Labs’ Arbitrum Technology and introduces parallel processing for enhanced scalability, efficiency, and cost reduction.
Innovation
Xai stands out as a pioneering Layer 3 solution specifically tailored for AAA gaming. By leveraging Offchain Labs’ Arbitrum Technology, Xai introduces parallel processing, which significantly enhances scalability and efficiency while reducing costs. This innovative approach addresses the long-standing challenges of speed, stability, and scalability in blockchain gaming.
Xai Architecture
The architecture of Xai includes several key components designed to optimize performance and user experience. The Sentry Node serves as an observation node monitoring the Xai rollup protocol, raising alarms in case of incorrect block proposals. Xai operates as an Arbitrum Orbit chain, harnessing Anytrust technology to achieve maximum speed and minimal costs. The system also includes gas fee subsidies for games deployed on the platform and prioritizes network reliability.
Code Quality
Xai is built using the Arbitrum Nitro codebase, which undergoes rigorous auditing processes to ensure security and performance. The code quality is generally good, but there is always room for improvement as the ecosystem evolves. Continuous development and audits are essential to maintain and enhance the integrity of the platform.
Product Roadmap
The product roadmap for Xai includes several ambitious goals. Initially, Ex Populus, a prominent game development studio, will deploy its games, Final Form and LAMOverse, on the Xai Blockchain. The roadmap also includes plans to support a diverse range of game genres and mechanics, encouraging developers to create engaging experiences. Future updates will likely focus on expanding the ecosystem, improving scalability, and enhancing user experience through ongoing technological advancements.
Usability
Xai prioritizes usability by providing an abstracted wallet and account experience for traditional gamers, allowing them to trade in-game items without dealing with crypto-wallets. Developers benefit from increased gas and contract limits, along with tools and resources to reduce friction in player interaction. Partnerships with Thirdweb facilitate seamless wallet integration, simplifying onboarding for players and ensuring a smooth user experience.
Team
The Xai Blockchain is developed and serviced by Offchain Labs under the direction of the Xai Foundation. The core development team includes members who previously worked on Arbitrum blockchains, bringing extensive experience and technical expertise to the project. This continuity ensures that the Xai Blockchain benefits from best-in-class technology support and a proven track record in blockchain development.
Conclusion
Xai represents a significant advancement in blockchain technology for the gaming industry. By addressing critical issues such as scalability, efficiency, and user experience, Xai is well-positioned to revolutionize the way traditional gamers interact with in-game economies. The combination of innovative architecture, robust code quality, and a clear product roadmap, supported by a highly experienced team, makes Xai a promising solution for the future of AAA gaming on the blockchain.
Initial Screening | |||
Keep researching | |||
Does this project need to use blockchain technology? | Yes | ||
Can this project be realized? | Yes | ||
Is there a viable use case for this project? | Yes | ||
Is the project protected from commonly known attacks? | Yes | ||
Are there no careless errors in the whitepaper? | Yes | ||
Project Technology Score | |||
Description | Scorecard | ||
Innovation (Out Of 11) | 10 | ||
How have similar projects performed? | Medium | 1 | |
Are there too many innovations? | Regular | 2 | |
Percentage of crypto users that will use the project? | Over 11% | 5 | |
Is the project unique? | Yes | 2 | |
Architecture (Out of 12) | 11 | ||
Overall feeling after reading whitepaper? | Good | 1 | |
Resistance to possible attacks? | Good | 2 | |
Complexity of the architecture? | Not too complex | 2 | |
Time taken to understand the architecture? | 20-50 min | 1 | |
Overall feeling about the architecture after deeper research? | Good | 4 | |
Has the project been hacked? | No | 0 | |
Code Quality (out of 15) | 13 | ||
Is the project open source? | Yes | 2 | |
Does the project use good code like C,C++, Rust, Erlang, Ruby, etc? | Yes | 2 | |
Could the project use better programming languages? | No | 0 | |
Github number of lines? | More than 10K | 1 | |
Github commits per month? | More than 10 | 2 | |
What is the quality of the code? | Good | 2 | |
How well is the code commented? | Outstanding | 2 | |
Overall quality of the test coverage? | Good | 1 | |
Overall quality of the maintainability index? | Good | 1 | |
When Mainnet (out of 5) | 5 | ||
When does the mainnet come out? | Mainnet | 5 | |
Usability for Infrastructure Projects (out of 5) | 5 | ||
Is it easy to use for the end customer? | Medium | 5 | |
Team (out of 7) | 3 | ||
Number of active developers? | 3+ | 1 | |
Developers average Git Background? | Intermediate | 1 | |
Developers coding style? | Reasonable | 1 | |
Total Score (out of 55) | 47 | ||
Percentage Score | |||
Innovation | 18.18% | ||
Architecture | 20.00% | ||
Code Quality | 23.64% | ||
Mainnet | 9.09% | ||
Usability | 9.09% | ||
Team | 5.45% | ||
Total | 85.45% |