Introduction
Xverse is a robust and secure super wallet designed to empower users in the Bitcoin Web3 space. It offers self-custodial features, biometric authentication, and a commitment to privacy, ensuring users have complete control over their assets and data. With various functionalities, Xverse is an essential tool for Bitcoin enthusiasts and those exploring the Web3 ecosystem.
Innovation
Xverse demonstrates innovation by supporting key features of the Bitcoin ecosystem. It enables users to directly manage Bitcoin, Stacks, and SIP10 tokens from the wallet. It also allows for the collection and transfer of Bitcoin NFTs, including Ordinals. By securely connecting to Bitcoin Web3 apps, Xverse opens up possibilities for decentralized finance (DeFi) applications, Bitcoin DAO participation, and exploration of layer-2 Bitcoin NFTs.
Architecture
The architecture of Xverse is well-designed and easy to understand. It integrates with various apps through different protocols, such as Sats Connect for Bitcoin connectivity and Hiro, micro-stacks, and Wallet Connect for Stacks connectivity. This seamless integration ensures smooth interaction with the Stacks ecosystem.
Code Quality
The code quality of Xverse is commendable. It is an open-source project that utilizes good programming languages like C, C++, Rust, Erlang, and Ruby, to count a few. The codebase has extensive lines of code and commits per month, indicating active development and a well-maintained project. The code is well-commented and demonstrates outstanding test coverage and maintainability index.
Product Roadmap
Xverse has an exciting roadmap that further enhances its functionality. Upcoming features include transferring Bitcoin using BNS names, trustless BTC swaps, lightning integration, and hardware wallet support. These additions will expand its capabilities, providing users more flexibility and convenience.
Usability
Xverse offers a seamless user experience, making it easy for end customers to navigate and utilize its features. It is designed to be user-friendly and accessible, ensuring a smooth onboarding process.
Team
The Xverse team consists of active developers with a solid coding style. They have a strong background in Git and demonstrate intermediate to advanced skills. The team’s commitment to the project is evident through their regular contributions and codebase maintenance.
Conclusion
Xverse, as a Bitcoin super wallet, brings Bitcoin to the Web3 ecosystem. Its innovative features, robust architecture, high-quality code, and user-friendly interface provide a valuable solution for managing Bitcoin assets and exploring the world of Bitcoin NFTs. The project showcases a strong team and a well-defined roadmap, ensuring continued development and improvement. Overall, Xverse scores an impressive 85.45% in our review.
.
| Initial Screening | |||
| Keep researching | |||
| Does this project need to use blockchain technology? | Yes | ||
| Can this project be realized? | Yes | ||
| Is there a viable use case for this project? | Yes | ||
| Is the project protected from commonly known attacks? | Yes | ||
| Are there no careless errors in the whitepaper? | Yes | ||
| Project Technology Score | |||
| Description | Scorecard | ||
| Innovation (Out Of 11) | 8 | ||
| How have similar projects performed? | Medium | 1 | |
| Are there too many innovations? | Regular | 2 | |
| Percentage of crypto users that will use the project? | 6% – 10% | 3 | |
| Is the project unique? | Yes | 2 | |
| Architecture (Out of 12) | 11 | ||
| Overall feeling after reading whitepaper? | Good | 2 | |
| Resistance to possible attacks? | Good | 2 | |
| Complexity of the architecture? | Easy | 2 | |
| Time taken to understand the architecture? | 20-50 min | 1 | |
| Overall feeling about the architecture after deeper research? | Good | 4 | |
| Has the project been hacked? | No | 0 | |
| Code Quality (out of 15) | 13 | ||
| Is the project open source? | Yes | 2 | |
| Does the project use good code like C,C++, Rust, Erlang, Ruby, etc? | Yes | 2 | |
| Could the project use better programming languages? | No | 0 | |
| Github number of lines? | More than 10K | 1 | |
| Github commits per month? | More than 10 | 2 | |
| What is the quality of the code? | Good | 2 | |
| How well is the code commented? | Good | 1 | |
| Overall quality of the test coverage? | Outstanding | 2 | |
| Overall quality of the maintainability index? | Good | 1 | |
| When Mainnet (out of 5) | 5 | ||
| When does the mainnet come out? | Mainnet Ready | 5 | |
| Usability for Infrastructure Projects (out of 5) | 5 | ||
| Is it easy to use for the end customer? | Yes | 5 | |
| Team (out of 7) | 5 | ||
| Number of active developers? | 5+ | 2 | |
| Developers average Git Background? | Intermediate | 1 | |
| Developers coding style? | Solid | 2 | |
| Total Score (out of 55) | 47 | ||
| Percentage Score | |||
| Innovation | 14.55% | ||
| Architecture | 20.00% | ||
| Code Quality | 23.64% | ||
| Mainnet | 9.09% | ||
| Usability | 9.09% | ||
| Team | 9.09% | ||
| Total | 85.45% |
