Introduction
In the pursuit of scalability and efficiency within the Ethereum ecosystem, zkSync Era emerges as a Layer-2 scaling solution employing Zero-Knowledge proof technology. With a mission centered around ‘hyper scalability,’ zkSync Era is poised to enable blockchain networks to scale in a manner akin to the internet, intending to process transactions at a volume without hindrance to security or cost-effectiveness.
Innovation
The innovation of zkSync Era lies in its unique application of Zero-Knowledge proofs, an area of cryptographic technology that allows verifying transactions without disclosing underlying data. By leveraging this technology, zkSync Era introduces Hyperchains, a network of sovereign ZK-chains tethered to Ethereum via trustless Hyperbridges. This concept is not only novel but also transformative in how blockchains could manage scalability.
Architecture
zkSync Era’s architecture is fortified by a sophisticated ZK tech stack that includes an LLVM-based Solidity compiler, an award-winning GPU prover, and the anticipated Redshift-proof system from Matter Labs. The synergy of these components reduces the cost per transaction, maintaining affordability. Furthermore, Hyperchains enable users to deploy their chains with distinct consensus mechanisms, validator sets, and data policies backed by the zkEVM engine, ensuring adaptability within the ZK Stack ecosystem.
zkSync Code Quality
The codebase of zkSync Era demonstrates high quality, with development processes being transparent and open-source, harnessing the collective expertise of a seasoned developer community. This commitment to quality and transparency is a testament to the protocol’s dedication to security and reliability.
Product Roadmap
zkSync Era’s product roadmap showcases a forward-looking approach with progressive milestones to realize a fully scalable, cost-effective, decentralized Layer-2 solution. Features like zkPorter indicate a path towards cheaper storage options, potentially revolutionizing cost structures compared to traditional Layer-1 solutions.
Usability
Regarding usability, zkSync Era supports synchronous atomic transactions, facilitating shared liquidity and spawning new use cases. The protocol enhances user experience by enabling gas payments in popular ERC-20 tokens and introducing account abstraction and paymaster functionality for flexible transaction fee management.
Team
The team behind zkSync Era is a collective of individuals with robust backgrounds in cryptography, blockchain technology, and software development. Their shared vision for a scalable blockchain future and their track record for delivering cutting-edge technology provides a strong foundation for the protocol’s success.
Conclusion
zkSync Era is a significant advancement in the Layer-2 scaling space, with a solid commitment to hyper scalability, innovation, and user-centric features. Its combination of technological prowess and strategic vision positions it as a pivotal player in scaling Ethereum. As the ecosystem continues to evolve, zkSync Era is poised to play a critical role in shaping the blockchain landscape to be more efficient, accessible, and adaptable.
Initial Screening | |||
Keep researching | |||
Does this project need to use blockchain technology? | Yes | ||
Can this project be realized? | Yes | ||
Is there a viable use case for this project? | Yes | ||
Is the project protected from commonly known attacks? | Yes | ||
Are there no careless errors in the whitepaper? | Yes | ||
Project Technology Score | |||
Description | Scorecard | ||
Innovation (Out Of 11) | 11 | ||
How have similar projects performed? | Good | 2 | |
Are there too many innovations? | Regular | 2 | |
Percentage of crypto users that will use the project? | Over 11% | 5 | |
Is the project unique? | Yes | 2 | |
Architecture (Out of 12) | 9 | ||
Overall feeling after reading whitepaper? | Good | 2 | |
Resistance to possible attacks? | Good | 2 | |
Complexity of the architecture? | Not too complex | 2 | |
Time taken to understand the architecture? | 20 – 50 min | 1 | |
Overall feeling about the architecture after deeper research? | Medium | 2 | |
Has the project been hacked ? | No | 0 | |
Code Quality (out of 15) | 14 | ||
Is the project open source? | Yes | 2 | |
Does the project use good code like C,C++, Rust, Erlang, Ruby, etc? | Yes | 2 | |
Could the project use better programming languages? | No | 0 | |
Github number of lines? | More than 10K | 1 | |
Github commits per month? | More than 10 | 2 | |
What is the quality of the code? | Good | 2 | |
How well is the code commented? | Good | 1 | |
Overall quality of the test coverage? | Outstanding | 2 | |
Overall quality of the maintainability index? | Outstanding | 2 | |
When Mainnet (out of 5) | 5 | ||
When does the mainnet come out? | Mainnet Ready | 5 | |
Usability for Infrastructure Projects (out of 5) | 5 | ||
Is it easy to use for the end customer? | Yes | 5 | |
Team (out of 7) | 5 | ||
Number of active developers? | 5+ | 2 | |
Developers average Git Background? | Intermediate | 1 | |
Developers coding style? | Solid | 2 | |
Total Score (out of 55) | 49 | ||
Percentage Score | |||
Innovation | 20.00% | ||
Architecture | 16.36% | ||
Code Quality | 25.45% | ||
Mainnet | 9.09% | ||
Usability | 9.09% | ||
Team | 9.09% | ||
Total | 89.09% |