Introduction
Zora Network is a Layer 2 solution designed to enhance the NFT and on-chain media experience, diverging from the DeFi-centric focus of many other Layer 2 networks. Leveraging the OP Stack and secured by Ethereum, Zora Network prioritizes security, scalability, and cost-efficiency, providing a robust environment for NFT creators and developers.
Innovation
Zora Network stands out with its NFT-first ecosystem, focusing on bringing media on-chain. While it employs established technologies like the OP Stack, its innovation creates a specialized ecosystem for NFTs and media rather than general DeFi applications. Including tools like the Protocol SDK, Zora API, and Nouns Builder highlights its commitment to simplifying NFT interactions and DAO deployment, making it easier for developers to integrate and utilize these technologies.
Architecture
Zora Network’s architecture is designed for simplicity and efficiency. It leverages the OP Stack for scalability and security, ensuring that transactions are fast and cost-effective. The straightforward architecture focuses on user-friendly interaction through the Protocol SDK, which automates transaction generation for ERC-1155 NFTs and other contracts. While beneficial for ease of use, this simplicity may be less groundbreaking regarding architectural innovation.
Zora Network Code Quality
The Zora Network codebase is well-written, demonstrating high standards of quality and maintainability. The comprehensive documentation and clean code structure make it accessible for developers. The Protocol SDK, Zora API, and Zora Dev Kit (ZDK) are well-documented and designed to facilitate easy integration, reflecting a strong commitment to quality and developer experience.
Product Roadmap
Zora Network’s product roadmap focuses on enhancing its existing features and expanding its ecosystem. Key milestones include further developing the Protocol SDK, enhancing the Zora API to support more comprehensive data retrieval and analysis, and expanding the capabilities of the Nouns Builder for DAO deployment. The roadmap also includes plans for increasing the network’s scalability and security, ensuring it can handle increased usage and complexity over time.
Usability
Zora Network excels in usability, providing a seamless experience for both developers and end-users. The Protocol SDK simplifies deploying and managing NFTs, while the Zora API offers straightforward access to NFT metadata and on-chain events. The ZDK removes the need for GraphQL knowledge, making it accessible to a broader range of developers. Additionally, the Nouns Builder facilitates quick and easy DAO creation, further enhancing the platform’s usability.
Team
The team behind Zora Network consists of four active developers, including one senior and three intermediate developers. Their combined expertise and commitment have been instrumental in building a robust and user-friendly platform. The team’s focus on quality and innovation is evident in the high standards of the codebase and the thoughtful design of the platform’s features.
Conclusion
Zora Network provides a comprehensive and user-friendly environment for NFT creators and developers. Focusing on media and NFTs fills a niche that many other Layer 2 solutions overlook. While it may not be the most innovative technology, its dedication to quality, usability, and a precise product roadmap positions it as a strong contender in the NFT space. With robust tools like the Protocol SDK, Zora API, Zora Dev Kit, and Nouns Builder, Zora Network offers a streamlined process for deploying, managing, and interacting with NFTs and DAOs, making it an ideal platform for media-centric blockchain applications.
| Initial Screening | |||
| Keep researching | |||
| Does this project need to use blockchain technology? | Yes | ||
| Can this project be realized? | Yes | ||
| Is there a viable use case for this project? | Yes | ||
| Is the project protected from commonly known attacks? | Yes | ||
| Are there no careless errors in the whitepaper? | Yes | ||
| Project Technology Score | |||
| Description | Scorecard | ||
| Innovation (Out Of 11) | 10 | ||
| How have similar projects performed? | Good | 2 | |
| Are there too many innovations? | Medium | 1 | |
| Percentage of crypto users that will use the project? | Over 11% | 5 | |
| Is the project unique? | Yes | 2 | |
| Architecture (Out of 12) | 8 | ||
| Overall feeling after reading whitepaper? | Medium | 1 | |
| Resistance to possible attacks? | Good | 2 | |
| Complexity of the architecture? | Easy | 2 | |
| Time taken to understand the architecture? | 20-50 min | 0 | |
| Overall feeling about the architecture after deeper research? | Medium | 2 | |
| Has the project been hacked ? | No | 0 | |
| Code Quality (out of 15) | 15 | ||
| Is the project open source? | Yes | 2 | |
| Does the project use good code like C,C++, Rust, Erlang, Ruby, etc? | Yes | 2 | |
| Could the project use better programming languages? | No | 0 | |
| Github number of lines? | More than 10K | 1 | |
| Github commits per month? | More than 10 | 2 | |
| What is the quality of the code? | Good | 2 | |
| How well is the code commented? | Outstanding | 2 | |
| Overall quality of the test coverage? | Outstanding | 2 | |
| Overall quality of the maintainability index? | Outstanding | 2 | |
| When Mainnet (out of 5) | 5 | ||
| When does the mainnet come out? | Mainnet ready | 5 | |
| Usability for Infrastructure Projects (out of 5) | 5 | ||
| Is it easy to use for the end customer? | Yes | 5 | |
| Team (out of 7) | 5 | ||
| Number of active developers? | 3+ | 1 | |
| Developers average Git Background? | Intermediate | 1 | |
| Developers coding style? | Outstanding | 3 | |
| Total Score (out of 55) | 48 | ||
| Percentage Score | |||
| Innovation | 18.18% | ||
| Architecture | 14.55% | ||
| Code Quality | 27.27% | ||
| Mainnet | 9.09% | ||
| Usability | 9.09% | ||
| Team | 9.09% | ||
| Total | 87.27% |
